Maryland MDOT certifications: Minority Business Enterprise (MBE), Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE), and Small Business Enterprise (SBE).
Primary NAICS: 541512 — Computer Systems Design Services
GSA SIN: 54151S — Information Technology Professional Services
Purchasing Channels
GSA MAS: In-scope IT professional services can be ordered through Contract 47QTCA22D007D, SIN 54151S, subject to the contract terms and your agency's applicable Schedule ordering procedures.
Government Purchase Card (GPC): Cardholder purchases are supported within the buyer's delegated micro-purchase authority and agency card-program rules.
Simplified acquisition: Open-market purchases may use FAR Part 13 when the complete requirement meets its conditions. Other agency contract vehicles follow their own ordering procedures.
Your acquisition team's decision: Your agency determines the applicable authority, competition requirements, and approvals. A displayed price ceiling does not establish direct-award eligibility. State and local buyers follow their jurisdiction's rules and funding conditions.
Experience coordinating modernization across your systems, delivery teams, and workforce while protecting service continuity.
Enterprise systems modernized or upgraded through production—experience managing change in live environments.
200+
Enterprise technology projects led, connecting delivery, governance, and change management.
30+
Average workforce size in supported organizations, informing adoption and change planning.
3,000+
Consecutive SAFe® Program Increments led, coordinating teams, dependencies, and delivery priorities.
20+
Selected Past Performance
Agency challenges. Proven outcomes.
See how we’ve helped agencies coordinate modernization, improve workflows, and deliver systems into production. These summaries describe work we performed; agency identities are generalized.
Past performance 1–2 of 10
Legislative1 of 10
Manual workflows
Quality management
Publishing QA and validation: days to under an hour.
Agency challenge
Manual Word compilation and multi-tiered QA capped output at 10 reports per day, delaying time-sensitive public reporting.
What We Delivered
We worked with mission teams to review the legacy process, capture end-to-end requirements, and evaluate publishing tools and emerging technologies. We delivered a redesigned publishing workflow incorporating USWDS design standards, Section 508 accessibility requirements, and security testing.
Agency outcome
The QA validation and publishing step fell from days to under an hour, helping staff release time-sensitive information sooner.
The minimum viable product arrived on time and on budget, with Section 508 compliance and union policy approval before release.
Legislative2 of 10
Knowledge access
AI adoption
Authorized generative AI for agency operations.
Agency challenge
Security boundaries, data privacy risks, and cybersecurity review made moving generative AI from experimentation into agency operations difficult.
What We Delivered
We architected a repository-grounded Amazon Bedrock chatbot using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) on AWS GovCloud, working with cybersecurity personnel on NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 controls and vulnerability review.
Agency outcome
Generative AI moved from experimentation into operational use with an agency Authorization to Operate (ATO).
Analysts and data scientists gained a repository-grounded way to explore internal knowledge through a conversational interface.
Legislative · Subcontractor3 of 10
Database migration
Migration assessment
From aging Oracle infrastructure to PostgreSQL on Azure.
Agency challenge
Aging Oracle infrastructure and a cloud-migration mandate forced a critical decision for mission-critical applications. Licensing transfer restrictions and costs complicated the option of moving to Oracle’s cloud.
What We Delivered
As a subcontractor, we assessed Oracle applications, schemas, stored procedures, and cloud options. We identified PostgreSQL on Azure as a viable path, performed the migration, and established automated DevOps testing for connected legacy applications.
Agency outcome
The migration approach saved the agency approximately $4M in combined Oracle licensing and managed service costs.
Automated testing supported application migration validation; data masking protected sensitive development and test data.
Civilian services4 of 10
Incremental change
Software delivery
Modernizing live services without disruption.
Agency challenge
Tightly coupled legacy code made changes difficult to isolate, putting continuity of public-facing filing and adjudication services at risk during modernization.
What We Delivered
We helped implement a hybrid-cloud delivery approach, using on-premises Red Hat OpenShift to containerize applications for deployment into Microsoft Azure environments, with CI/CD pipelines and automated security testing.
Agency outcome
Modernized components supported live filing and adjudication services used by applicants and staff.
Two-week agile cycles supported incremental service improvements, giving agency teams a repeatable path for continued change.
Federal enterprise5 of 10
Workforce access
Zero Trust
VPN bottlenecks slow access for remote personnel.
Agency challenge
Traditional VPN routing sent remote traffic through data centers, creating bandwidth bottlenecks, latency, and security risks for distributed personnel.
What We Delivered
We led scaled agile delivery, captured requirements, and coordinated Zscaler Internet Access and Private Access integration with the agency’s ICAM team, including federated single sign-on and automated client deployment.
Agency outcome
Remote personnel gained direct-to-cloud application access and federated single sign-on across connected systems.
Traditional data center backhauling was replaced, with as-built documentation supporting the agency’s ongoing technical and security work.
Legislative6 of 10
Delivery predictability
Risk visibility
From siloed projects to agency-adopted scaled agile delivery.
Agency challenge
Teams worked in silos. Mismatched schedules and readiness blocked dependent work, disrupted delivery, and obscured portfolio risks and spending.
What We Delivered
We introduced and implemented SAFe® using a crawl, walk, run approach, combining training and education with consolidated project management, application delivery, and fiscal-quarter planning.
Agency outcome
The agency adopted scaled agile and lean portfolio practices, connecting priorities, budgets, and delivery across concurrent enterprise projects.
Leadership and teams gained shared visibility into dependencies, risks, and spending to guide planning, budget management, and delivery decisions.
Law enforcement7 of 10
Operational continuity
Controlled change
Improving workflows while protecting operations.
Agency challenge
Changes to IT workflows affected teams across separate operational domains, making service improvements difficult to introduce without risking disruption.
What We Delivered
We engineered workflows on a domain-separated ServiceNow platform, coordinated agile iterations, documented configurations, and tested the effects of changes across domains.
Agency outcome
Modernized IT service workflows entered operation within the domain-separated platform.
Cross-domain testing and configuration documentation helped teams manage changes while protecting continuity of service.
State judiciary8 of 10
Workforce systems
State government
Production enhancements for judicial workflows.
Agency challenge
Complex business rules and database dependencies made defects and application changes difficult to resolve in systems judicial personnel relied on.
What We Delivered
We provided full-stack software engineering across development, testing, and production, including web services, user-interface components, database improvements, and documentation.
Agency outcome
Production application enhancements supported the workflows judicial personnel relied on.
System and user documentation helped agency teams maintain the updated applications and support the people using them.
Civilian agency9 of 10
Remote access
Cloud desktops
Cloud desktops for distributed teams.
Agency challenge
Legacy virtual desktops created remote-access bottlenecks, on-premises maintenance overhead, and data residency risks.
What We Delivered
We architected and deployed Azure Virtual Desktop host pools, with profile and storage management, secure connectivity, and automated operating-system image updates.
Analytics personnel gained isolated high-compute environments, with data transfer controls supporting access to the resources their work required.
Defense10 of 10
Database performance
Security reviews
Audit-log queries: minutes to milliseconds.
Agency challenge
Investigators waited over five minutes for individual audit-log reports. Legacy database structures and unoptimized queries delayed time-sensitive security reviews.
What We Delivered
We reverse-engineered PL/SQL procedures and triggers, optimized Oracle indexes and query execution paths, and engineered Unix Bash batch automation.
Agency outcome
Production audit-log queries fell from over five minutes to milliseconds.
Investigators could retrieve reports for security reviews with substantially less waiting, using the existing Oracle database.
Your next step
What could this experience help your agency accomplish?
These examples show past work, not promised results for a new engagement.
Explore the delivery, technology, workforce, and modernization outcomes we can help your team work toward.
Secure delivery, technology evaluation, AI enablement, and modernization give your teams the foundations to improve services and achieve mission outcomes.
Scaled Agile & Secure Continuous Delivery
Connect teams, priorities, and dependencies through scaled agile delivery. DevSecOps and continuous security evidence support secure releases and agency authorization needs, including continuous Authorization to Operate (cATO) where applicable.
Modernize applications, cloud platforms, and integrations incrementally. Testing, security checks, transition planning, and knowledge transfer help sustain critical operations.
SAFe and Scaled Agile Framework are registered trademarks of Scaled Agile, Inc.
Simplified Acquisition Opportunities
Three focused ways to move your mission forward.
Identify improvement opportunities, plan a selected initiative, or put a shared workflow into use. Each engagement can be purchased independently; choose the one that fits your agency's next decision.
Defined scope, an agreed firm-fixed price & clear acceptance criteria for each engagement.
Assess
AI Enablement & Workflow Readiness Assessment
For development, delivery & operations teams that need to advance a specific operational workflow.
10–15 business days
Scoped under $15,000
1 team & 1 delivery or operations workflow. Remote delivery. Firm-fixed-price engagement with defined deliverables. Excludes third-party licensing, cloud infrastructure & usage charges.
Help unblock one specific operational workflow with practical configuration guidance & human review checkpoints.
What you receive
Team workflow & review checkpoints
Configuration recommendations & a working session
Prioritized improvements & a 90-day action plan
View scope, deliverables & assumptions
Your challenge
Readiness gaps in tools, handoffs or human review are slowing a specific workflow improvement.
What you receive
A documented team workflow showing how requirements, supporting context, tools, automation, validation & human review connect, including ownership, handoffs & review checkpoints.
A prioritized improvement backlog & decision log connecting readiness gaps to recommended actions, expected benefits, assumptions, human review effort, risks & evidence still needed.
Configuration & integration guidance for existing tools within the selected workflow. For development or DevOps teams, this can include IDE setups, repository integrations & CI/CD pipelines, including GitHub Actions where used.
Documented configuration & workflow-integration recommendations for requirements & knowledge-management tools. For Jira & Confluence teams, examples include workflow configuration, automation triggers & connections between work tracking & supporting documentation.
A prioritized action plan for moving the selected improvement forward over the next 90 days, linking recommended changes to expected operational benefits, proposed owners, prerequisites, dependencies, skill needs, review checkpoints & proposed success measures.
Intended outcome
Your team has a practical path to advance the selected improvement, with prioritized actions, proposed ownership, review checkpoints & measures of progress.
How it works: Interviews, approved documents, agency-led walkthroughs & selected meeting observation or co-facilitation. Direct system accounts are not required.
Guided working session: We guide your team over the shoulder through configuration steps in a sample workflow, using approved materials or an illustrative environment. The session shows how the recommended workflow, automation triggers, integrations & human review checkpoints fit together. Agency-authorized users retain control of their tools & perform any changes in agency systems.
Review focus: Requirements, planning, handoffs, versioning, checks, releases & feedback within one development, delivery or operations workflow, including scaled agile practices where relevant.
Boundaries: Assessment, documented recommendations, workflow documentation, configuration guidance & a guided working session only. We do not modify agency boards, workflows, automation rules or integrations. The action plan covers recommended next steps for the following 90 days. Implementation in agency systems, builds, model validation & control testing are excluded. Restricted information requires agreed handling arrangements.
For agency leaders who need a clear implementation plan for a selected AI or workflow improvement.
30 days
Scoped under $25,000
1 use case; design for up to 2 external integrations. Firm-fixed-price engagement with defined deliverables. Excludes third-party licensing, cloud infrastructure & usage charges.
Resolve the design, integration, ownership, evaluation & cost questions needed to make an implementation decision.
A brief defining users, outcomes, scope & acceptance criteria.
A workflow & technical design covering systems, data, integrations, human review, exceptions & ownership.
An implementation backlog with priorities, initial estimates, dependencies & acceptance criteria.
An evaluation plan with relevant security, privacy & approval responsibilities.
A delivery roadmap with skills, responsibilities, cost estimates & assumptions.
Intended outcome
Your staff or another contractor can use the editable design, backlog & estimates to take the next implementation step.
How it works: Design workshops, technical interviews & backlog reviews guided by the Discover, Refine & Enable stages of SolutionsMET’s DREAMM™ framework. Your users, process owner, technical leads & agency reviewers participate.
Scope: One selected initiative with named stakeholders. Existing agency work can establish the starting point; the assessment is optional.
Technical scope: Architecture, configuration & any control mapping are agreed during scoping, including Jira or Confluence guidance where relevant.
Boundaries: Design & planning for one initiative. Enterprise strategy, agency-wide transformation & implementation are separately scoped. Estimates depend on the available information.
For a delivery team ready to implement & operate an agreed AI or automation workflow together.
90 days
Scoped under $350,000
1 delivery team & 1 agreed workflow. Firm-fixed-price engagement with defined deliverables. Excludes third-party licensing, cloud infrastructure & usage charges.
Put a shared AI or automation workflow into practice, demonstrate it against agreed measures & equip your team to maintain & improve it.
What you receive
Working AI or automation workflow
Shared context, configuration & checks
Team practice & operational handoff
View scope, deliverables & assumptions
Your challenge
Your team needs a working AI or automation workflow with maintained context, clear handoffs & human review.
What you receive
A working workflow in your approved environment, with configured tools, shared context, human review & exception handling.
Version-controlled code or configuration, reusable task templates, automated checks & an agreed integration or release process.
Evaluation results from representative tasks against agreed success measures & functional, quality & security criteria.
Guided team practice & operating instructions, including ownership of context, configuration & review responsibilities.
Maintainer knowledge transfer, handoff records & a prioritized backlog for further improvements.
Intended outcome
Your delivery team can demonstrate the workflow against agreed success measures & maintain it after an operational handoff, with clear ownership & next steps.
How it works: Iterative delivery, automated validation & operational rehearsals guided by SolutionsMET’s DREAMM™ innovation-to-operations approach. Your team rehearses handoffs; a named maintainer demonstrates operation & updates.
Scope: One delivery team, one workflow & named repositories & integrations. A data pipeline is included only where needed & explicitly scoped. Your agency provides approved tools, environment, data, access & usage or licensing costs.
Technology fit: Use existing approved platforms where practical. Tool access, repository boundaries & any MCP connections are agreed before kickoff.
Boundaries: Scope, access & acceptance criteria must be agreed before kickoff. Full bootcamps, custom model hosting, enterprise governance, wider rollout & ongoing operations are separately scoped.
Pricing & third-party costs: Each engagement delivers defined outputs at an agreed firm-fixed price. Your agency provides the approved environment & funds third-party licensing, cloud infrastructure & usage charges, including model/API consumption.
Statement of Work (SOW): We agree on final fixed pricing, milestones, deliverables, editable file and repository formats, usage rights, inspection and acceptance criteria, and review and revision periods during scoping.
Ready to begin: Delivery periods begin once the SOW and engagement-specific prerequisites are agreed and required materials and agency stakeholders are available. The assessment uses approved materials and agency-led walkthroughs; implementation access is agreed separately. We confirm the start date and delivery-team availability with you.
MVP starting requirements: MVP delivery starts with agreed scope, initial design, acceptance criteria, and access, established through an AI & Workflow Implementation Blueprint or equivalent agency work. Your acquisition team determines how to scope and procure the complete requirement.
Production use: The MVP includes implementation, iterative delivery, and handoff. Use in production depends on your agency's approvals, including any required Authorization to Operate (ATO); the engagement does not grant an ATO.
Tell us what you need to accomplish, your timeline, and any purchasing questions. We’ll discuss the relevant experience and engagement options for your requirement.
